<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HISTORY OF ECONOMICS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economics-addicted.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economics-addicted.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Know-all :)</title>
		<link>http://www.economics-addicted.com/2006/06/01/history-of-economics/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Know-all :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economics-addicted.com/?p=53#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™d like to finish this story. 
So, Marshall's analysis was downplayed, and the work of more formal economists of the 1800s (such as Leon WaIras, Francis Edgeworth, and Antoine Cournot) was seen as the basis of the science of economics. Economic analysis that focuses only on formal interrelationships is called Walrasian economicsâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™d like to finish this story.<br />
So, Marshall&#8217;s analysis was downplayed, and the work of more formal economists of the 1800s (such as Leon WaIras, Francis Edgeworth, and Antoine Cournot) was seen as the basis of the science of economics. Economic analysis that focuses only on formal interrelationships is called Walrasian economicsâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

