The Global Economy and Business

Starting your business while singing a franchise agreement has many advantages over starting a company yourself. It is easier, it takes less time and you can get help and support from more experienced partner (the main company). But not so many people decide to buy a franchise license. I think that one of the main reasons for this is initial fee that a potential franchisee needs to pay to franchisor.
Today I want to say a few words expressing my opinion regarding why the franchise fee is so high. My observations are based on the following statistics given by the leaders of some franchises:
“Ron Eriksen, the vice president of market development for the Baby’s Room USA Inc., Elmhurst, Ill., provides the following facts: last year the company sends out 775 four-color brochures by Priority Mail costs $14. Only 6 percent of those recipients sent back a preliminary application form; 1.8 percent of the 775 became new Baby’s Room franchisees”.
My calculations and comments:
It means that the company spent $10,850 only for colorful brochures and received only 14 new franchisees (775 requests multiplied by 1.8 percent). So only to get the money back the Baby’s Room USA Inc. has to increase the franchise fee by $775. Is it fair? Maybe franchisee will say no because nobody wants to pay for the others who decided not to become franchisees of that company. But it’s absolutely fair from franchisors point of view.

“Steven Romaniello, president and chief operating officer of US Franchise Systems Inc., in Atlanta, says that his hotel company spends $50,000 on promotion and recruitment efforts for each franchisee who eventually buys a Days Inn, Microtel or Hawthorn Suites franchise”.
No comments needed. Even if franchisor decides to cover a part of this sum himself (let’s say 50 percent) the other part has to be included into the initial fee. The other part will be received by franchisor later in the form of royalty payments. By the way this can explain why sometimes royalty is greater than the cost of current support provided to franchisee: franchisor tries to cover some earlier expenditures.
Greg Longe, president of the Molly Maid and Mr. Handyman franchise systems in Ann Arbor, Mich., says, “Our Internet leads are way up this year, but all that means is that we have to do a lot more work to generate a solid candidate. Most of the people we’re hearing from aren’t qualified to run our concept.”
My comments:
When he says “a lot more work to generate a solid candidate” he speaks about people who will do this work. Company needs to hire qualified manager (or even managers) to deal to convert at least some of the leads to new franchisees. Company bears the costs of salary, Internet and phone communications, and many others dedicated to manager’s work. And as every cost it will increase the final price. In our case it will increase the initial fee in the start-up period or royalty during the operational period.

And initial fee includes not only advertising and recruitment costs. In most cases the main company provides training for the chief manager or key personnel of new franchisee. To do this they need to pay to trainers, to buy some stuff (like materials, paper and so on)…
Thinking about all that things I came to the conclusion that low initial franchise fee can be a bad sign (not “is” but “can be”). Certainly it depends on business sphere and region or country. But at least it’s a point to think over one more time whether to sing a franchise agreement with a company that sells its idea for the price that doesn’t cover the costs. It may seem strange…